Machine Learning Project: Planar data classification with one hidden layer
Planar data classification with one hidden layer
1 - Import The Packages
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from testCases_v2 import *
import sklearn
import sklearn.datasets
import sklearn.linear_model
from planar_utils import plot_decision_boundary, sigmoid, load_planar_dataset, load_extra_datasets
%matplotlib inline
2 - dataset
X, Y = load_planar_dataset()
Visualize the dataset using matplotlib. The data looks like a “flower” with some red (label y=0) and some blue (y=1) points.
# Visualize the data:
plt.scatter(X[0, :], X[1, :], c=Y, s=40, cmap=plt.cm.Spectral);
We have:
- a numpy-array (matrix) X that contains your features (x1, x2)
- a numpy-array (vector) Y that contains your labels (red:0, blue:1).
3 - Simple Logistic Regression
Before building a full neural network, lets first see how logistic regression performs on this problem.
# Train the logistic regression classifier
clf = sklearn.linear_model.LogisticRegressionCV();
clf.fit(X.T, Y.T);
Plot the decision boundary.
# Plot the decision boundary for logistic regression
plot_decision_boundary(lambda x: clf.predict(x), X, Y)
plt.title("Logistic Regression")
# Print accuracy
LR_predictions = clf.predict(X.T)
print ('Accuracy of logistic regression: %d ' % float((np.dot(Y,LR_predictions) + np.dot(1-Y,1-LR_predictions))/float(Y.size)*100) +
'% ' + "(percentage of correctly labelled datapoints)")
Accuracy of logistic regression: 47 % (percentage of correctly labelled datapoints)
4 - Neural Network Model
Logistic regression did not work well on the “flower dataset”. Lets build a nn-model with 1 hidden layer. Our model structure is: Again, the general methodology is:
- Define the neural network structure ( # of input units, # of hidden units, etc).
- Initialize the model’s parameters
- Loop:
- Implement forward propagation
- Compute loss
- Implement backward propagation to get the gradients
- Update parameters (gradient descent)
4.1 - Defining the neural network structure
def layer_sizes(X, Y):
"""
Arguments:
X -- input dataset of shape (input size, number of examples)
Y -- labels of shape (output size, number of examples)
Returns:
n_x -- the size of the input layer
n_h -- the size of the hidden layer
n_y -- the size of the output layer
"""
n_x = X.shape[0] # size of input layer
n_h = 4
n_y = Y.shape[0] # size of output layer
return (n_x, n_h, n_y)
4.2 - Initialize the model’s parameters
def initialize_parameters(n_x, n_h, n_y):
"""
Argument:
n_x -- size of the input layer
n_h -- size of the hidden layer
n_y -- size of the output layer
Returns:
params -- python dictionary containing your parameters:
W1 -- weight matrix of shape (n_h, n_x)
b1 -- bias vector of shape (n_h, 1)
W2 -- weight matrix of shape (n_y, n_h)
b2 -- bias vector of shape (n_y, 1)
"""
np.random.seed(2) # we set up a seed so that your output matches ours although the initialization is random.
W1 = np.random.randn(n_h,n_x)* 0.01
b1 = np.zeros((n_h,1))
W2 = np.random.randn(n_y,n_h)* 0.01
b2 = np.zeros((n_y,1))
assert (W1.shape == (n_h, n_x))
assert (b1.shape == (n_h, 1))
assert (W2.shape == (n_y, n_h))
assert (b2.shape == (n_y, 1))
parameters = {"W1": W1,
"b1": b1,
"W2": W2,
"b2": b2}
return parameters
4.3 - The Loop
def forward_propagation(X, parameters):
"""
Argument:
X -- input data of size (n_x, m)
parameters -- python dictionary containing your parameters (output of initialization function)
Returns:
A2 -- The sigmoid output of the second activation
cache -- a dictionary containing "Z1", "A1", "Z2" and "A2"
"""
# Retrieve each parameter from the dictionary "parameters"
W1 = parameters["W1"]
b1 = parameters["b1"]
W2 = parameters["W2"]
b2 = parameters["b2"]
# Implement Forward Propagation to calculate A2 (probabilities)
Z1 = np.dot(W1,X)+b1
A1 = np.tanh(Z1)
Z2 = np.dot(W2,A1)+b2
A2 = sigmoid(Z2)
assert(A2.shape == (1, X.shape[1]))
cache = {"Z1": Z1,
"A1": A1,
"Z2": Z2,
"A2": A2}
return A2, cache
def compute_cost(A2, Y, parameters):
"""
Computes the cross-entropy cost given in equation (13)
Arguments:
A2 -- The sigmoid output of the second activation, of shape (1, number of examples)
Y -- "true" labels vector of shape (1, number of examples)
parameters -- python dictionary containing your parameters W1, b1, W2 and b2
Returns:
cost -- cross-entropy cost given equation (13)
"""
m = Y.shape[1] # number of example
# Compute the cross-entropy cost
logprobs = np.multiply(np.log(A2),Y)+np.multiply(np.log(1-A2),1-Y)
cost = -1/m*np.sum(logprobs)
cost = np.squeeze(cost) # makes sure cost is the dimension we expect.
# E.g., turns [[17]] into 17
assert(isinstance(cost, float))
return cost
def backward_propagation(parameters, cache, X, Y):
"""
Implement the backward propagation using the instructions above.
Arguments:
parameters -- python dictionary containing our parameters
cache -- a dictionary containing "Z1", "A1", "Z2" and "A2".
X -- input data of shape (2, number of examples)
Y -- "true" labels vector of shape (1, number of examples)
Returns:
grads -- python dictionary containing your gradients with respect to different parameters
"""
m = X.shape[1]
# First, retrieve W1 and W2 from the dictionary "parameters".
W1 = parameters["W1"]
W2 = parameters["W2"]
# Retrieve also A1 and A2 from dictionary "cache".
A1 = cache["A1"]
A2 = cache["A2"]
# Backward propagation: calculate dW1, db1, dW2, db2.
dZ2 = A2-Y
dW2 = 1/m*np.dot(dZ2,A1.T)
db2 = 1/m*np.sum(dZ2,axis=1,keepdims=True)
dZ1 = np.dot(W2.T,dZ2)*(1-np.power(A1,2))
dW1 = 1/m*np.dot(dZ1,X.T)
db1 = 1/m*np.sum(dZ1,axis=1,keepdims=True)
grads = {"dW1": dW1,
"db1": db1,
"dW2": dW2,
"db2": db2}
return grads
def update_parameters(parameters, grads, learning_rate = 1.2):
"""
Updates parameters using the gradient descent update rule given above
Arguments:
parameters -- python dictionary containing your parameters
grads -- python dictionary containing your gradients
Returns:
parameters -- python dictionary containing your updated parameters
"""
# Retrieve each parameter from the dictionary "parameters"
W1 = parameters["W1"]
b1 = parameters["b1"]
W2 = parameters["W2"]
b2 = parameters["b2"]
# Retrieve each gradient from the dictionary "grads"
dW1 = grads["dW1"]
db1 = grads["db1"]
dW2 = grads["dW2"]
db2 = grads["db2"]
# Update rule for each parameter
W1 = W1-learning_rate*dW1
b1 = b1-learning_rate*db1
W2 = W2-learning_rate*dW2
b2 = b2-learning_rate*db2
parameters = {"W1": W1,
"b1": b1,
"W2": W2,
"b2": b2}
return parameters
4.4 - Integrate parts 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 in nn_model()
def nn_model(X, Y, n_h, num_iterations = 10000, print_cost=False):
"""
Arguments:
X -- dataset of shape (2, number of examples)
Y -- labels of shape (1, number of examples)
n_h -- size of the hidden layer
num_iterations -- Number of iterations in gradient descent loop
print_cost -- if True, print the cost every 1000 iterations
Returns:
parameters -- parameters learnt by the model. They can then be used to predict.
"""
np.random.seed(3)
n_x = layer_sizes(X, Y)[0]
n_y = layer_sizes(X, Y)[2]
# Initialize parameters, then retrieve W1, b1, W2, b2. Inputs: "n_x, n_h, n_y". Outputs = "W1, b1, W2, b2, parameters".
parameters = initialize_parameters(n_x, n_h, n_y)
W1 = parameters["W1"]
b1 = parameters["b1"]
W2 = parameters["W2"]
b2 = parameters["b2"]
# Loop (gradient descent)
for i in range(0, num_iterations):
# Forward propagation. Inputs: "X, parameters". Outputs: "A2, cache".
A2, cache = forward_propagation(X, parameters)
# Cost function. Inputs: "A2, Y, parameters". Outputs: "cost".
cost = compute_cost(A2, Y, parameters)
# Backpropagation. Inputs: "parameters, cache, X, Y". Outputs: "grads".
grads = backward_propagation(parameters, cache, X, Y)
# Gradient descent parameter update. Inputs: "parameters, grads". Outputs: "parameters".
parameters = update_parameters(parameters, grads)
# Print the cost every 1000 iterations
if print_cost and i % 1000 == 0:
print ("Cost after iteration %i: %f" %(i, cost))
return parameters
4.5 Predictions
def predict(parameters, X):
"""
Using the learned parameters, predicts a class for each example in X
Arguments:
parameters -- python dictionary containing your parameters
X -- input data of size (n_x, m)
Returns
predictions -- vector of predictions of our model (red: 0 / blue: 1)
"""
# Computes probabilities using forward propagation, and classifies to 0/1 using 0.5 as the threshold.
A2, cache = forward_propagation(X, parameters)
predictions = (A2>0.5)
return predictions
It is time to run the model and see how it performs on a planar dataset.
# Build a model with a n_h-dimensional hidden layer
parameters = nn_model(X, Y, n_h = 4, num_iterations = 10000, print_cost=True)
# Plot the decision boundary
plot_decision_boundary(lambda x: predict(parameters, x.T), X, Y)
plt.title("Decision Boundary for hidden layer size " + str(4))
- Cost after iteration 1000: 0.288083
- Cost after iteration 2000: 0.254385
- Cost after iteration 3000: 0.233864
- Cost after iteration 4000: 0.226792
- Cost after iteration 5000: 0.222644
- Cost after iteration 6000: 0.219731
- Cost after iteration 7000: 0.217504
- Cost after iteration 8000: 0.219454
- Cost after iteration 9000: 0.218607
# Print accuracy
predictions = predict(parameters, X)
print ('Accuracy: %d' % float((np.dot(Y,predictions.T) + np.dot(1-Y,1-predictions.T))/float(Y.size)*100) + '%')
Accuracy: 90% Accuracy is really high compared to Logistic Regression. Now, lets tune the hyperparameters of the model.
plt.figure(figsize=(16, 32))
hidden_layer_sizes = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 20, 50]
for i, n_h in enumerate(hidden_layer_sizes):
plt.subplot(5, 2, i+1)
plt.title('Hidden Layer of size %d' % n_h)
parameters = nn_model(X, Y, n_h, num_iterations = 5000)
plot_decision_boundary(lambda x: predict(parameters, x.T), X, Y)
predictions = predict(parameters, X)
accuracy = float((np.dot(Y,predictions.T) + np.dot(1-Y,1-predictions.T))/float(Y.size)*100)
print ("Accuracy for {} hidden units: {} %".format(n_h, accuracy))
- Accuracy for 1 hidden units: 67.5 %
- Accuracy for 2 hidden units: 67.25 %
- Accuracy for 3 hidden units: 90.75 %
- Accuracy for 4 hidden units: 90.5 %
- Accuracy for 5 hidden units: 91.25 %
- Accuracy for 20 hidden units: 90.0 %
- Accuracy for 50 hidden units: 90.75 %
Accuracy increased as we increased the layers, i.e. as we make the model deeper. But we can also see that it overfitted more with higher hidden layer sizes.
Interpretation:
The larger models (with more hidden units) are able to fit the training set better, until eventually the largest models overfit the data. The best hidden layer size seems to be around n_h = 5. Indeed, a value around here seems to fits the data well without also incurring noticable overfitting. Later models will include regularization and other optimization algorithms.